Posts Tagged ‘Bias’

ENJOY PEOPLE MORE AND REDUCE STRESS BY RELEASING JUDGMENT

Monday, August 30th, 2010

In our professional lives as lawyers and in our personal lives as regular people we tend to see others through the lens of judgment, dividing them into human kinds, some worthy of spending time with and getting to know and others not. Why is that we are so ready to find some strangers promising candidates for inclusion in our social world yet equally ready to disdain, reject and distance ourselves from other strangers?

This weekend I got to observe and experience this process while on a trip with my 9 year old son Elliott, my friend Bruce and Bruce’s 10 year old son Diego. The four of us live in the Bay Area. On Friday night we drove to a cabin on Alpine Lake in the Sierra Mountains. Saturday we spent the day trout fishing with lures, power bait and worms. The scenery (a mountain lake at 8,000 feet elevation) was beautiful, but the trout weren’t biting because it was quite cold and windy for a late August day. Instead of eating pan fried trout in our cabin as we had hoped, we settled for some tasty pizza at the nearby Bear Valley ski lodge which was open for mountain bikers and hikers.

On Sunday we spent our day in and near the little town of Murphys named after the town’s founder John Murphy who made 1.5 million in the Gold Rush, married a survivor of the bad luck Donner Party and left to become mayor of San Jose. The town and its immediate surroundings are a mix of  old settler culture; small business people who are staunchly Republican; organic farmers; wine makers; olive oil makers; gourmet chefs; motorcycle clubs whose members ride Harleys and sport Harley Davidson clothes; and good ole boys who rekindle memories of the Dukes of Hazard.

Just before hitting town we stopped at Quayle Pottery. This is farm/winery which makes its own clay, glaze and pottery on the premises and sells modeling clay to local schools. The owner’s daughter Dolores invited us in and showed us around their clay making operation, pottery studio and vineyard. We got to hang out with the farm’s pet geese, a small flock of Chinese geese with black beaks and large, black horn-like protuberance sticking up out their foreheads. These geese were not only tame but downright friendly. They helped the farmer out by eating the weeds in his garden. One of the geese was named Gaggle. Dolores held him in her arms like a small dog, petted him and stroked his long s-shaped throat. She invited us to pet him and we did. It was great fun. Elliott got to see that country folks could be surprisingly kind and interesting and that just because a town has a lot of McCain-Palin bumper stickers on the cars doesn’t make it a cold or hostile place.  

In the afternoon we went zip lining on the grounds of Moaning Caverns. The young men who helped us on and off the zip line were tall, lanky college age guys sporting long hair, unkempt beards and tattoos. They were nice, friendly guys with good senses of humor who cracked us up with their jokes. We asked what else we could do for fun before we went home and we were told about Natural Bridges, a place a few miles away where a creek had cut a grotto out of the limestone. We drove over and had a blast. Once you get in the creek you can swim into, through and out the back of a cave with a tall roof. The depth of the water in the middle of the cave is over six feet. The cave was covered in stalactites and stalagmites displayed in many shapes, sizes and colors. The stalactites were dripping water into the creek below. The water felt freezing and must have been in the 50s.

The people sitting around the creek or enjoying the swim through the grotto were a mix of families and bikers with big arms and lots of tattoos. There were some picnic tables near the grotto. One of them was occupied by a very loud, boisterous group of bikers. They were drinking beer from cans, smoking, joking and laughing uproariously. My son and I overhead one of them say, “There’s nothing in the whole world I like more than to have a beer, smoke and shoot something.” Elliott turned and looked at Bruce and I. He said, “I just can’t imagine anyone thinking that way.”

From Elliott’s perspective this guy had just landed from outer space and expressed a form of logic which did not compute here on Earth. The problem was that Elliott was surrounded by other people who felt the same way as the speaker. Not only that but all of them were human beings just like Elliott who were just as entitled as he was to enjoy the sunshine, the air, the creek, the Grotto and the picnic tables. This started a discussion about tolerance, and the need for us to see commonalities in people rather than stop at the obvious differences which seem to divide us.

Bruce and I are both love to take long bicycle trips, but never ride motorcycles. The people we ride bikes with under our own leg power wear Spandex with names like CSC and Credit Agricole. They like wine and cheese and love to ride bikes in groups in the countryside. They fantasize about riding in France or Italy. The bikers wear black leather with names like Iron Spartans and the Forgotten Ones. They like chips and beer. They like to ride everywhere including multi-lane highways where they can go faster than cars. We asked Elliott if bicyclists and bikers are really that different.

Don’t both of them love riding in the countryside with friends in the sunshine? Don’t both of them love a certain style of clothes bearing names that have a certain sound? Don’t both have their own lingo, their own heroes and their favorite snacks? Bicyclists love to fly down hills after a tough grind uphill. What if bicyclists got a chance to ride a motorcycle? Wouldn’t they likely enjoy the speed and the steering in turns? What if bikers got a chance to ride a fine road bike and experience the challenge and camaraderie that goes with a tough group ride ending in a communal feast? Wouldn’t they enjoy it? It became pretty easy to imagine that we could all exchange places and it might be fun to do so. Suddenly the other side didn’t seem so alien or so objectionable.

Before driving home to the Bay Area we ate in town at a local cantina because the boys wanted burritos. The friend tortilla chips and salsa were incredible. The food was tasty, filling and cheap. The young waitresses, all high school girls, were super friendly and gave us good suggestions for menu selections. Bruce and I began to philosophize about the difference between seeing a place as tourist and spending time in a place in an open-minded, open-hearted way that connects you with its people.

You don’t have to leave your country, your state or your region within a state to be a tourist. It’s very possible to see strangers in your own city, your own neighborhood and even your own block from the eyes of a tourist.  A tourist sees strangers as colorful alien beings with a different way of life whose customs and mannerisms range from the quaint/pleasant to the disturbing/grotesque. When you choose to see strangers as other people, then the surface differences that come from where people live and how they earn their money begin to dissolve and you are able to accept and appreciate them. At that moment their differences become interesting and intriguing and a source of celebration rather than a reason for dismissing them as weird. The critical factor is releasing judgment. When you can release judgment you will enhance your relationships and reduce your stress at the office and at home.

EMOTIONAL FREEDOM – RELATING TO YOUR EMOTIONS AS ADVISORS NOT RULERS

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

           Lawyers perceive themselves as rational actors and believe their actions are based  upon thorough analysis of the pros and cons of different options. While lawyers are more articulate in rationalizing their actions than most other people, they are just as vulnerable as anyone else to falling prey to emotional turmoil. Neuroscience tells us that about 5% of our cognitive machinery is conscious while the other 95% is subconscious. If we are going to increase our self-knowledge and reduce the emotional turmoil we so often feel when faced with events, it will surely help to learn more about the emotions that bubble up from our depths. 

             Emotions are always triggered by events, but we can learn to incorporate space in our response to events so our response is not automatic. It’s possible to achieve emotional freedom, but not by ignoring or fighting with your emotions. A person who is conscious of his emotions, who understands what they represent and who understands their limits as sources of information for his behavioral choices, can listen to what his emotions are urging him to do, while preserving his freedom to act differently.  

             Emotions involve a physiologic state, a core thought and an inclination to act which combine to produce behavior. This is true for positive and negative emotions. When you’re in love your body is flooded by endorphins. You experience joy in the presence of your beloved with the core thought of wanting your beloved to feel the same joy. You are inclined to express your love by compliments, affectionate gestures or gifts. When you are angered by what you perceive as offensive conduct, you go into fight-flight. You have a thought along the lines of “how dare he do that to me. I will make him pay for that” combined with an intention to retaliate. You want the other to feel pain.

             The bodily sensations which accompany the physiologic changes of emotion and the core thought embedded in the emotion are very powerful. Many of us are so dominated by the bodily sensations and core thought of an emotion that we get drawn along like being swept out to sea by an undertow. This is what Aristotle meant when he called emotions the passions. When the emotion at issue is a negative one like envy, fear, anger, or hate, we can get so stirred up that we say or do things that are not consistent with what we stand for and which we later regret. 

             Emotions are part of our internal guidance system. They get our attention and let us know when we are being affected by someone or something. Emotions present us with information yet the information is not always correct or complete. Emotions don’t give us the whole perspective on any given situation. The person who is seized with the emotion of love for someone else may fail to notice his love is not returned, and will have to undergo many painful rejections before grasping the truth. A lawyer who flies into a rage over a perceived act of disrespect may learn that the other person acted with good grounds and no ill intent, leaving the lawyer to feel foolish and asking himself “why did I get so upset over nothing?” 

             We all have emotional buttons that can be pushed. According to Shannon Duncan, author of Present Moment Awareness, these buttons are associated with our struggles to cope with the damage to our self-worth we incurred during childhood. Duncan says most people learned to play a role to get approval from their parents, one that conceals an underlying insecurity, a false belief that that we are flawed in some fundamental way so we had better cover over the flaw.

             As adults we do many things unconsciously to hide the flaw, whether it’s workaholism, amassing a fortune, dieting to stay thin, over-exercising, smoking or drinking to excess. We suffer anxiety when our coping mechanisms falter or fail. When someone says or does something that hits home and calls our attention to our self-perceived flaw, we can go ballistic.

             Because of our vulnerability we are more easily hurt and irritated than we imagine. Most of us struggle with our emotions to the point where the emotions are far more troublesome than the minor incident that triggered them. How many times you experienced instant emotional turmoil in response to an event? What really pushes your buttons?

             How about opposing counsel making a string of objections at a deposition that you consider frivolous and which obstruct your line of inquiry? What about opposing counsel suggesting you have coached your witness? How about opposing counsel refusing to take his motion to impose sanctions off calendar even after you turned over the documents he sought to compel? What about opposing counsel refusing to continue a trial date to let you have a vacation you wanted?

             Will having your emotional buttons pushed throw you so far off your path that you can’t recover? The term responsibility refers to our ability to respond according to calm deliberation rather than blindly or automatically. The clue that we are being ruled by our emotions is when we feel taken over by them, and when we respond to a situation immediately, compulsively and unwisely. When you are able to pause, take a breath and step back your vision widens. You are in a position to see yourself, the entire situation and your many options for responding.

 Understanding Emotional Reactivity

             In Present Moment Awareness, Shannon Duncan says most people do not participate in their own lives because they are day dreaming; complaining about or regretting the past; and worrying about the future. Whether they are sitting at their desks, attending a meeting or driving their car, most people will suddenly wake up and realize they have been someplace else. Frequently their body is tight and in an awkward position. It’s quite sad when you think about all the precious, irretrievable moments that pass people by while they are lost in thought instead of living in the now. The now is the only time we can really connect with ourselves, with our creativity, with other people or with nature.

             Duncan argues that to truly be present you must be deeply aware of the sensations in your body, the details of your environment and what is going on around you. Then you are able to be “right here, right now.” When we are truly present, we are alive to this moment and able to live it without distraction by worries or emotional turmoil. If you are mowing the lawn, then stay aware of the tension in your arms, the sweat on your brow, the color and smell of the green grass, the light and warmth of the sun and the vastness and blueness of the sky, rather than losing yourself in worries about paying bills, thinking about driving your kid to the dentist or wondering what’s for dinner.

             In the first part of his book Duncan sets forth an exercise designed to help you strengthen your present moment awareness. This requires you to sit in a quiet place, breathe deeply, mentally scan your body for tension and mentally scan the sensory qualities of your immediate environment. You are to approach the exercise in a spirit of gentleness and with complete acceptance of what is, which means no judgments. While it would be wonderful if we could hone this present moment awareness through sitting quietly alone to the point where we could face any real-world situation without emotional turmoil, that’s just wishful thinking.

             In the second part of his book Duncan rightly tells us that we will continue to experience emotional upheavals in response to what other people say or do until we do some work with our emotions. Until we can control our emotions we will suffer “emotional reactivity,” which means our emotions overwhelm us and seemingly force us to act in one particular way without affording us choices. Have you been in depositions where all the lawyers were threatening, badmouthing and insulting each other while the witness and the court reporter gaped open mouthed? What was that like? How did it feel? Did you enjoy it or were you terribly disappointed at how far things had slid down the slope of civilization and wishing it could be different? 

             Why do lawyers, or anyone else for that matter, react so angrily to each other? Duncan’s says that how we perceive the world determines how we react to it. When we perceive the world in a way that creates anxiety it is impossible for us to relax, to enjoy our lives or to do our work without painful tension. Duncan quotes Arthur Somers Roche:

             “Anxiety is a thin stream of fear trickling through the mind. If encouraged, it cuts a chancel into which all other thoughts are drained.”

             In Happy For No Reason, Marci Shimoff tells us the average human being has about 60,000 thoughts a day of which 45,000 are automatic, repetitive and negative thoughts such as “I’m fat and ugly,” “I’m on a losing streak and things can’t get much worse,” “I need more money,” “I’ll be happy if I win the lottery,” or “I hate this job, I wish the weekend was here.” Anxious, negative thoughts arose during evolution as a means of ensuring the survival of early humans. The ones who sensed a saber toothed tiger around every corner lived on to reproduce, while the mellow relaxed types got eaten.

             The problem for humanity is general is that our brains are still wired to generate anxious, negative thoughts in an environment that is much more physically safe. The problem for lawyers is that much of our activity can generate anxious, negative thoughts because it involves conflict, argument, competition, performance and judgment.  

             In his witty description of the uselessness of anxiety, Mark Twain said that most of the worst things in his life never happened. Emotional freedom comes from recognizing that most of what we perceive a threat really isn’t. How can we neutralize anxiety as a driving force in our lives? Duncan says it’s crucial to distinguish between what we want (like being thin, attractive and mega-rich) and what is essential to our survival (oxygen, food and water).

             He uses the example of an IRS audit putting us in a total panic as if having to pay overdue taxes with interest and penalties and making due with less cash in the bank was a life and death situation. Thanks to this confusion we go into and stay in fight-flight and may feel as if we want to crawl out of our own skin. The need to tune down the anxiety is what drives lawyers to drink to excess, use drugs, smoke or compulsively eat, gamble, shop, exercise or engage in sex. 

             Duncan correctly points out that real life will always have its ups and downs, but when we let the downs become dramas inflated out of proportion to the real threat by anxiety, then we suffer needlessly. If life is a ride wouldn’t you prefer to be present for the ride and enjoy it, rather than crushing the wheel in your grip, having a tight stomach and a head full of worst case scenarios of future events? If you can’t stay present you will miss out on countless wonderful moments – hugs from our kids, the freshness of the air after a cleansing rain, a humming bird visiting your garden or a gorgeous sunset.

             What mental movies get played in the theater of our minds are determined by our dominant emotion. If we fear the audit and feel sad because we’re sure the IRS is going to impoverish us, then all the movies we play will be fearful, sad or both. That means all of our perceptions of other people and our encounters with them will be saturated with those negative feelings.

             Duncan says getting to emotional freedom means noticing when you get absorbed in fantasies that create or maintain a fearful or bleak mood; identifying the circumstances that  trigger these fantasies; and identifying the insecurities that trigger them. It is not the events outside us that create our emotional turmoil, but our beliefs about them. Duncan counsels us to remain present and acknowledge our emotional state without beings swept away into “thoughtless reactivity or useless fantasies.” 

             Fighting our emotions by telling ourselves to stop being fearful, anxious or angry will just double the strength of these negative emotions. Duncan’s approach to dealing with negative emotions is akin to what alcohol and drug counselors tell their patients to do with cravings. Ride them out. Let your emotional baggage complete its journey.  Enduring a craving and letting it travel through our system won’t kill us and the same is true of a negative emotion.

             Duncan says the only way out of our emotional pain is to pass through it. Once you have passed through it, you can ponder what was so powerful about the circumstances or people that you were seemingly forced to give up the power to determine how you feel or how to behave.

             Getting to the “inner space,” that quiet, contemplative place available to us after the stormy negative emotion has run its course, puts us in an excellent position to figure things out. That’s when we can really see some of our unconscious patterns and increase our emotional freedom still more. Duncan reminds us that our inner space is always there for us when he says, “Just remember that we always have more space available within us than any emotional reaction could ever fill.”

             Duncan closes the second part of his book with an exercise to increase emotional awareness. The idea is to learn to observe emotions as they occur in your body and learn how to deal with them so they won’t overwhelm you. The end zone for this work is to buffer emotional reactivity, increase your control over how you react to other people, preserve your inner calm and give yourself access to more options and choices. 

             Duncan wants us off the “reactivity roller coaster,” He hopes that, “Instead of being consumed with the desire to act based solely on the influence of any one emotion, we take a moment to see the big picture. With this, we see a wealth of new choices, allowing us more freedom and opportunities.”        

An Exercise For Letting Go

             Neuropsychologist Rick Hanson, Ph.D. has said that positive emotions slip right off like Teflon while negative emotions stick like Velcro. This has to do with our hardwired negativity bias. The good news is that we can teach ourselves to be more positive. Martin Seligman’s book Learned Optimism is one good teaching source and another one is Marci Shimoff’s Happy For No Reason: 7 Steps to Being Happy from the Inside Out.

             What makes negative feelings so sticky? Shimoff believes it has to do with our tendency to fight them. When we experience our inner critic telling us for the one millionth time that we are ugly, stupid, lazy or not as good as another sibling, we waste a great deal of time and energy arguing with the statement and trying to find a line of reasoning to extinguish it once and for all. Why not just let these self-defeating feelings go?

             Remarkably many people believe their emotions are attached to them and cannot be released. Shimoff says this just isn’t so. It’s possible to release any thought or emotion. She discusses the success people have when they use the Sedona method which bids people to ask themselves three questions about their negative belief: Can I let this feeling go? Would I let it go? When? She mentions one person who had to be confronted with the question whether she would prefer to hold onto her negative belief about herself or be shot in the head? This helped her to see it was quite possible to let go of the belief, and free herself to live in the present and enjoy her life. What will it take for you?

             Sometimes people suffer their emotions because they think their emotions represent reality or that their emotions are facts. Shimoff says emotions are neither, and we are under no obligation to believe them. Byron Katie has argued that all suffering is mind created and comes from believing the false ideas we have about ourselves that were formed during childhood. Katie is internationally famous for creating The Work, a series of four questions about the most painful thought you hold about yourself, which are as follows.

             (1) Is it true? (2) Can I absolutely know that it’s true? (3) How do I feel when I believe that thought? (4) Who would I be without that thought? Then you do a “turnaround” statement which asserts the opposite of your old, self-denigrating thought, and you find three true examples from your life to support the turnaround. The Work enables you to question the truth of the belief that made you suffer, to feel how good your life would be if let it go and give you the emotional freedom to live without it.          

             Shimoff has her own exercise for letting go. Hold onto a pen as tightly as you can. The pen represents your negative core belief about yourself, and the hand represents your awareness. Although there is some discomfort at first after a while it feels “normal” to grip the pen so hard, and this is exactly what we do with our negative beliefs. We grip them so tightly we forget we’re doing it. Now roll the pen around in your hand noticing it’s not attached to your hand. This helps you see that you and your feelings are not attached. You are not your feelings. Now drop the pen. That’s what it means to let go.  Feel how good and how free your hand feels. Without the emotional turmoil that comes from allowing others to push our button, our conscious awareness will feel like the hand that has released the pen.

 Using Techniques for Emotional Freedom in Relation To Other Lawyers

             The techniques set forth by Shannon Duncan and Marci Shimoff for freeing ourselves from negative self-beliefs and the emotional reactivity that goes with it are critical to being present and enjoying life. These techniques can be extended to our dealings with other lawyers. The Sedona Method and The Work can both be directed towards feelings we hold towards other lawyers that divide us by making us feel superior to, inferior to or fundamentally different from them. The pen we grip so tightly can equally well represent a biased, irrational judgment that all plaintiff lawyers are crooks, all defense lawyers are heartless or all judges are arbitrary tyrants.

             In order to go beyond emotional reactivity we have to stop holding tightly to old ideas about who we are and who the lawyers we face are. Just as we exaggerate our own flaws and then cover them up to make ourselves feel better, we exaggerate the flaws of other lawyers and then expose them for the same reason. This isn’t serving anyone. It’s creating and maintaining a brew of stomach churning emotional turmoil.

             If you find yourself going off at the handle and disliking that feeling of loss of control, it’s time you took some time to look into this whole business of attaining greater emotional freedom. The books by Shannon Duncan and Marci Shimoff are an excellent place to start. I would also highly recommend taking a class in meditation

AVOID DEPRESSION, INCREASE JOY AND REACH YOUR POTENTIAL BY ADOPTING A GROWTH MINDSET

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

             Like life, law practice presents constant challenges to our intelligence. Sometimes we are up to the challenge. When that happens we perform well, we make very few errors and we obtain most or all of what outcome we desired. Sometimes we’re not up to the challenge. We perform poorly, we make a lot of errors and we obtain little or none of the desired outcome. The meaning we ascribe to losing can have a neutral emotional impact or one so negative it plunges us into depression and keeps us from being joyful or reaching our potential. It all depends our mindset.  

             Alexander Pope said that “to err is human and to forgive divine.” Can you forgive yourself when you don’t come out on top in an arbitration, mediation, trial or business transaction? Psychologists used to think that the primary cause of depression was a major loss of some kind coupled with an inability to grieve or to resolve one’s grief through accepting the loss and committing oneself to move on and make the most of what one had left. These days psychologists are focusing less on the loss itself than on the person’s skills and resources for coping with loss, and especially on the person’s attitude towards losing someone or something he valued.  

             The Buddha told us 2,500 years ago that suffering comes from clinging to what gives us pleasure. Why? Because everything changes and dissolves in time. Every person, relationship, object and circumstance that we want in our life will pass away. Loss is endemic to life and is unstoppable.

             Due to parental expectations we all grew up wanting things – whether it was going to Harvard Law School, becoming a famous lawyer, becoming a Supreme Court Judge or something less grand and more attainable. Along our ladder to success we came up against ever smarter people and more intense competition as we went from high school, to college, to law school, and into the real world of fiercely battling lawyers. The vast majority of us never got all that we wanted. We suffered the normal human lot of frustrations, setbacks and disappointments.

             This pattern of competing for something you want and not always getting it has continued and will continue throughout our careers. The “it” could be a raise in salary, a corner office, a partnership, leadership of one of your firm’s practice groups, a judgeship, election to a prominent, State Bar position, election to a powerful public office, a deanship at a law school, a particular award or honor, membership in an exclusive society or club, a certain level of affluence, notoriety or influence or winning a major case being followed in the press.   

             There are two basic ways of responding when you don’t get the “it” that you wanted. One way is to judge yourself as being incompetent and unworthy, which leads you to feel helpless, hopeless and depressed and renders you passive.  The other way is not to take it personally, to investigate what factors played a role in the outcome and figure out how to get a better outcome for yourself next time around. Just as some athletes and politicians are crushed forever by a poor showing in a big game or an election, others bounce back and come back stronger than before because they looked for the lesson in the loss, found it and made positive use of it.

             The onset of depression in adult life is very high for precocious people who easily came out on top academically with little effort when they were younger, but began struggling in graduate school or when they began their career and had no resiliency due to a rigid mindset. Has this happened to you or some other lawyers you know? The rate of major depression among lawyers is incredibly high. One out of every five lawyers suffers from it. If a new understanding of how one’s mindset towards failure can lessen this rate of depression, then we should all rush to gain that understanding.

             In MINDSET: THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY OF SUCCESS -  HOW WE CAN LEARN TO FULFILL OUR POTENTIAL, Stanford University psychologist Carol S. Dweck, Ph.D. offers an analysis of human mindsets which has the capacity to help many lawyers avoid depression or overcome their current state of depression. Dr. Dweck has been studying the relationship of mindset to personality, motivation, achievement and depression for her entire career. She held the William B. Radford Professor of Psychology Chair at Columbia University and is currently the Virginia Eaton Professor of Psychology at Stanford University.

             Dr. Dweck distinguishes between the rigid mindset and the growth mindset. Dr. Dweck says our upbringing causes us to go through life with one or the other, yet it is possible to transform your rigid growth-limiting mindset to a growth mindset as an adult by understanding the differences between them and by using techniques to promote the transformation. See www.brainology.us

 The Pitfalls of the Rigid Mindset

             The rigid mindset is one that causes depression, limits professional growth and limits enjoyment of one’s work. Sadly it is more common than the growth mindset. Those of you who suffer from the rigid mindset should recognize it as I describe it.         

             A young lawyer who grows up with a rigid mindset will not see a challenge (such as a trial against a tough, wily and highly experienced courtroom veteran) as an opportunity to learn and grow. He will see it as a test of whether he is a somebody or a nobody, a winner or a loser. Win or lose, he will see the outcome of the trial as a direct and infallible measure of the entire amount of intelligence, creativity, talent and resourcefulness he was given at birth.

             In his mind the win or loss will brand him as competent or incompetent, worthy or unworthy, useful or useless. Although the trial will simply give him some information about his current abilities and will say nothing about where he could end up if applied himself, he won’t see it that way. He will see the trial as a readout of his innate, permanent and unalterable repertoire of abilities.  

             The lawyer with the rigid mindset classifies himself and other lawyers as either being gifted naturals or ungifted plodders. In his mind you’re either a super fast hare or a an agonizingly slow tortoise and he doesn’t want to be the tortoise. It doesn’t occur to him that he can and will become a much better trial lawyer by asking other lawyers for advice, reading about trial techniques or taking a multi-day training in advanced trial techniques. .

             While a person with a growth mindset enjoys success because it shows how much he’s learned in order to be successful, a person with a rigid mindset seeks success only to prove how smart he is. Therefore he fears failure as if it was a finger pointing out his stupidity. The rigid mindset person is concerned with being better than and superior to others based on inborn talent. The idea of going back to school to improve his trial technique is unappealing. If he has to go back to school with other lawyers to learn how to perform better in the courtroom it’s a sign he’s not gifted or superior, that he’s just another nobody

             Dr. Dweck uses the careers of famous scientists, inventors, artists, educators, coaches, athletes and others to show they were filled with the desire for constant self-improvement and insatiable curiosity to learn the new things that would help them improve. None of these folks were afraid to lose. They saw losing as coming from a lack of knowledge or skill that could be remedied through learning, not as a judgment of the universe on the limits of their quality and value.   

             When a lawyer with a rigid mindset loses a trial, he will not shrug it off, take responsibility, ask himself what went wrong and try to find ways to improve his trial preparation and trial tactics. If he loses he will say to himself things like “I suck,” “I’m incompetent,” and “I don’t deserve to be a trial lawyer.”  He will feel intense shame and slide into depression. He will experience a cognitive distortion, namely the certainty that he doesn’t have what it takes and never will. The shame and depression that go with that false self-perception will paralyze him from growing from the loss. They will inhibit him from taking more risks in the future, because if he takes a chance it could expose his flaws and cause more pain.

             The lawyer with the rigid mindset who has experienced shame is so aversive to feeling shame again that he protects himself in every possible way. He declines cases that have any perceptible weaknesses and delegates them to others. He finds excuses not to go to trial. If he does go to trial, he sets the situation up so he will have ready-made excuses for losing, and if he does lose he casts the blame everywhere but on himself. He no longer sees a trial as an opportunity to mix it up, to stretch himself and have some fun while learning and growing.

             The prospect of losing, which would expose his incompetence for all to see, is so terrifying that he simply will not give his all in the effort. If he did give his all and lost, it would represent an iron clad judgment that his best was not enough and he’s just a born loser. Dr. Dweck points out that reaching your potential doesn’t necessarily mean winning or becoming famous. Rather, reaching your potential means giving whatever you do your fullest and best effort. People with the growth mindset enjoy giving their best effort even when they lose

 The Growth Mindset

             The polar opposite of the rigid mindset is the growth mindset. Persons with the growth mindset see their potential as virtually unlimited. They understand they can grow smarter with age and their brains are like a muscle which can grow stronger with use. They know that by applying themselves to challenges, and opening themselves to learning, they become better at their chosen activity. When a coach, teacher or peer tests their abilities they do not feel they are being judged as winner/loser, competent/incompetent or worthy/unworthy.

             They see the test as a gauge of where they are at this particular moment in time in their learning curve, one that can help guide their way as they continue on their learning path. When a coach chews out a star athlete for not playing up to his ability, the player can vow to work harder and show the coach what he can really do, or the player can construe the coach to mean he’s a less talented prospect than he was rated to be and just quit. Dr. Dweck’s research has convinced her that the biggest ingredient in success is not inborn smarts, but having a growth mindset and putting in the effort and sweat needed to really master an activity.

             Law is a very competitive occupation with a lot of smart people. Losing a case is not a badge of dishonor, nor does it mean you don’t have what it takes to be a successful lawyer. What will prevent you from reaching your potential is not a loss in trial, but construing that loss to mean you don’t have the ability and never will. Once you stop judging yourself, you become more relaxed, less guarded and more open. It becomes easier to be yourself, because you don’t have to hide your humanity and pretend you’re perfect.  

             Dr. Dweck has other refinements to offer on mindset that are quite helpful. One is that if you’re a woman or a member of a minority, you may be extra-sensitive to any suggestion by someone else that you aren’t capable of making it at the level you’re aiming for. She uses an example from her own life. Although she had received a 99 in geometry, algebra, and trigonometry, she ended up dropping calculus in high school because her male teacher told her it was too hard for girls and she believed him!

             This unfortunate but very real vulnerability to sexist, racist and other prejudiced comments comes from unconscious cultural conditioning or what is known as implicit bias. Dr. Dweck says the combination of that extra-sensitivity with a rigid mindset can be devastating, thus it is especially important for women and members of minorities to work on cultivating a growth mindset. Likewise, it is very important for people who have a tendency towards becoming depressed to work on it.

             Dr. Dweck has another very helpful point about how we see criticism. She mentions a Ph.D. candidate who essentially collapsed when her doctoral committee returned her draft thesis with ten single spaced pages of criticism ripping just about everything apart. When it was explained to the candidate that it was her committee’s job to find any flaws, because the paper was going to be published in a prestigious national journal, and that their criticism were not meant as criticisms of her, she changed overnight. Her energy returned and she went to work by improving her thesis to meet all the criticisms. Her thesis was warmly accepted and she got her Ph.D.

             Opposing counsel are like doctoral thesis committees in the sense they believe their job requires them to rip apart the other lawyer’s substantive work product. While there is no doubt that some lawyers go overboard (by their incredibly hostile tone and threats of sanctions), the point is worth understanding. If you have a rigid mindset you are more likely to feel personally attacked by opposing counsel’s criticism of your investigation, research and writing and more likely to feel depressed by reading the criticism because you feel he is really judging you to be ignorant, stupid or incompetent.  If you have a growth mindset, you don’t take it personally. You can read the criticism in a relaxed way, see if it has any merit and then launch into your efforts to meet and defeat the criticism.

             Dr. Dweck says living with a growth mindset motivates us to learn and help others learn, while living with a rigid mindset leaves us in a tense, judge-and-be-judged world. You cannot possibly lead a happy, creative and useful life if you see life as a matter of who is superior to who based on who has more innate intelligence or talent. If you have a growth mindset already that’s wonderful. If you don’t, then now is the time to start cultivating one so you can be more open, energetic and joyful and reach your potential.