Posts Tagged ‘Anxiety’

PARTNER UP WITH A WORK BUDDY TO MAKE MORE ACCURATE, LESS STRESSFUL DECISIONS

Friday, August 27th, 2010

Lawyers have to make a steady stream of decisions every day. These range from the small (whether to interrupt an activity to take a call) to the hugely consequential (whether to reject a final offer of settlement and go to trial). When it comes to making big decisions do you trust yourself above all others and make them alone or do you consult a colleague? If you make them alone you pay a price. What price? You may be sacrificing accuracy without the objectivity a colleague can provide, and you are certainly incurring more stress. When you make decisions alone you are completely responsible for them even though you may be missing something that a colleague might have seen.

The old saying that “two heads are better than one,” turns out to be largely true. In a study published in the August 2010 issue of the journal Science neuroscientists Bahador Bahrami from UCL (University College London) and Chris Frith from Aarhus University, Denmark, explored the relative accuracy of collective vs. solo decision making on a low level perceptual task. The task involved detecting a very weak signal on a computer screen, one that was so weak there could be legitimate disagreement as to whether the signal had occurred or not.

What the researchers found was that for two observers of nearly equal visual sensitivity, two heads were definitely better than one, provided they were given the opportunity to communicate freely about their perceptions. Their accuracy did not depend on getting feedback from the researchers. Simply being told by the researchers which one of them was right did not increase accuracy. But when one observer with good visual sensitivity was paired with another observer with poor visual sensitivity, two heads performed worse than one because the person with poor visual sensitivity influenced the person with better sensitivity to make the wrong decision. The researchers concluded that the optimal conditions for making a perceptual decision (did I actually see something or not?) are having a partner of comparable visual sensitivity and being able to freely discuss your perceptions with each other.

It’s logical to assume that making a complex legal decision would follow the same model. If so, then two heads are better than one provided you select a partner of comparable intellectual capability who is given access to the same information you have, and you communicate freely with each other regarding your perceptions of the data. Following this model of decision making can increase your accuracy and lower your stress at work.

HIGH SENSITIVITY TO SOCIAL REJECTION TRIGGERS INFLAMMATORY DISEASE – LEARN TO MODIFY YOUR RESPONSE TO SOCIAL STRESS

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

Some people love to speak in public, while others fear it worse than death. Some people are energized by the prospect of a job interview and march in with confidence, while others fear the worst and blow it because they are self-conscious and ill-at-ease. Some people are able to take a “no” in stride and enjoy the dating process, while others make excuses to avoid asking people out and crumble when they reach out and receive a no. 

People in some occupations get ignored or hear “no” more than others. Lawyers are right up there with telemarketers and people selling life insurance or financial investment products. Our legal system is set up to be adversarial. It exists to process disputes between two sides that want different outcomes, hold to different positions and make opposed arguments. Whether it’s a motion, a trial or a negotiation, lawyers constantly hear no. It gets frustrating, irritating and discouraging to keep hearing no from opposing counsel. It can be downright depressing to hear no from a judge or jury. Some lawyers are said to have a “tough hide,” and they are able to shake off rejection and defeat. But not all lawyers are emotionally bullet proof. Some of them are quick to perceive rejection and hate the feeling.

What goes on in the bodies of people who are extra sensitive to social rejection? That’s what psychologist Shelly E. Taylor, Ph.D. and psychoneuroimmunologist George Slavich, Ph.D., at UCLA wanted to find out. They recruited 124 people (54 men and 70 women) and put them throw two stressful social situations. In the first they had to prepare and deliver an impromptu speech and perform difficult mental arithmetic in front of a socially rejecting panel of raters wearing white lab coats. Mouth swabs were taken before and after the test to determine if changes had occurred in two biomarkers for immune system response marked by increased inflammation – greater release of tumor necrosis factor-a and interleukin-6 (IL-6).

In the second test 31 of the participants underwent an MRI brain scan while playing a computerized game of catch with what they believed were two other real people. For the first half of the test the game was between three people, but midway through the game the other two players excluded the participant and played on their own causing the participant to feel rejected.

On MRI some of the subjects showed greatly increased activation of two areas of the brain known to respond to social stress, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and anterior insula. Those very same subjects showed greater increases in tumor necrosis factor-a and IL-6 as a result of their lab test facing the stern, frowning panel of raters in white lab coats.

Dr. Slavich said this study confirms the very close relationship between mind and body and helps elucidate some of the neurocognitive pathways involved in inflammatory response to social stress. According to Dr. Slavich this is important because frequent or chronic episodes of inflammation in response to the mere perception of social stress can increase the risk for asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease and even depression.

Why would the human brain trigger the release of inflammatory proteins via the immune system when it perceives social threat or rejection? Dr. Slavich said that social ostracism in the cave man days meant death because you would have to hunt and defend yourself alone in a world full of dangerous predators and hostile bands of competitors. Thus social ostracism goes hand in hand with anticipation of physical injury and the activation of the immune system before the injury occurred could have some survival value.

What can people do to control their response to situations in which they anticipate or perceive social rejection? Dr. Slavich suggested that you question your belief that people are rejecting you. If there’s no solid evidence it’s true, then you can dismiss the belief and relax your tense mind.  For example if someone doesn’t return your call it’s not necessarily because they don’t like you. It may be that they are away from the office, incredibly busy that week, just plain disorganized or overwhelmed by all the emails and calls they get.  

There are many ways to reduce the negativity and intensity of your response to social stress. Sometimes the answer is skills training. If your greatest fear is public speaking then enrolling in your local Toastmasters club will really help, because Toastmasters has helped tens of thousands of people from all walks of life (including new immigrants with little English) to overcome their fear of public speaking and become confident, effective public speakers. The typical charge to belong is just $100 per year.

In most situations it boils down to your perspective. If your self-esteem is always on the line and it rises or falls with the result of every encounter you have with another person, you’re in deep trouble because none of us can control how other people respond to us and when we attempt to do this we’re perceived as manipulative. If you’re over-focused on something you regard as a defect you won’t be able to connect with others with a feeling of comfort and ease. Do you see yourself as too short, too bald, too fat, too ugly or too something? Do you hate your nose or your accent? Are you terribly self-conscious about the no-name law school you attended or the fact that you have a family member who is much more successful than you?

Are you constantly worried that you might not make partner? Do you evaluate every decision and every interaction with others in terms of how they affect your potential for partnership? Do you live in fear that others may discover something you’re ashamed over? Do you actively try to hide it? Whatever it is (be it a current problem with binge drinking or the imposition of professional reprimand twenty years ago) the fear of discovery is going to make you jittery around others and make you curious as to whether they know your dark secret.

There are two methods for dealing with such anxieties which can free you to interact with others less stressfully. One is to learn self-acceptance. There are many fine books and CDs which teach self-acceptance. I have written a number of blog articles on this topic using such concepts as self-compassion and self-forgiveness. The other method, which I want to talk about here, is self-forgetting – the process of realizing the self is a fiction and letting it go.

Eckhart Tolle (author of The Power of Now) is a leading exponent of self-forgetting in the popular media. While I have certainly enjoyed and gained a lot from reading his books and listening to his lectures on CD, much of my understanding of self-forgetting comes from Tarthang Tulku the Buddhist Lama who founded the Nyingma Institute in Berkeley, CA.

Tarthang Tulku says that the mind clothes itself and renders itself tangible to itself in a purely mind-created projection it calls the self. The self is like a magnet which attracts stories – stories which the mind has spun to make sense of its experiences in the world and stories which others have proffered to mind. Whether you define yourself your own way or you have allowed others to define you (such as your parents, teachers, professors, spouse or boss), either way you are placing narrow, artificial limits on your being and you are shaping the way you perceive and interpret events and situations. Depression is the difference between what you believe you should have accomplished and what you have accomplished.

If your self is a victim in your story than you’re likely to be on guard against rejection, disappointment and victimization. When you meet someone you analyze his every word and scrutinize all his facial micro-expressions for approval/disapproval. If your self is a conquering hero it’s all great until you suffer a long series of small defeats or one big humiliating disaster. As of August 2010 Tiger Woods (arguably the greatest golfer who ever lived) can’t make a golf shot, because the self he constructed with the help of PGA Tour, the press, and his fans has been shattered. Whether you’re a goat or a hero in your own story you’re loading yourself with stress because you’re always waiting for mistreatment and abuse or because you’re always working hard to stay on top.

If you confuse being (the state of existing in the present moment as a being) with having a self, then your focus is not on living in this moment but on how the self is faring (well or ill) and you are lost in tension-riddled comparisons between your self, your past and future selves and other selves. 

Tarthang Tulku recommends daily meditation to release the self and come back into the state of pure being unconditioned by stories about who we are, why we are, what we must do and so forth. He says that meditating in this way leads to compassion for all beings and unity with all beings – a condition of existence in which fear of others (social stress) cannot exist. I have been meditating in this way and making progress along this path.  I commend it you.

TRAIN YOUR BRAIN USING OPEN FOCUS EXERCISES TO DIFFUSE STRESS AND RELIEVE ANXIETY OR DEPRESSION

Monday, July 26th, 2010

The human brain is an electro-chemical organ which produces a small but measurable amount of electric current in the form of gamma, beta, alpha, delta and theta waves. Each wave type has a range of frequencies associated with different types of mental activities. The brain does not emit any one wave type in pure form. At any given moment it emits a mix of two or more wave types. The predominant wave type can vary s with the part of the brain being measured. EEG brain wave patterns vary depending on whether a person is awake and actively concentrating, awake and resting, falling asleep, in deep slow wave sleep or dream (REM) sleep; in a fearful, tense and fight-flight state; in a calm, meditative state; or in states of consciousness affected by such things as sexual arousal or consumption of alcohol or drugs. Mental illnesses and alcoholism show distinctive brain wave patterns.

Neuropsychologist Les Fehmi, Ph.D., is an expert in the link between brain waves and stress reduction. After doing his post-doctoral work at the UCLA Brain Research Institute, he became a pioneer in neurofeedback therapy. Neurofeedback is a method of helping individuals reduce stress levels and anxiety symptoms by gaining control over their central nervous system using EEG biofeedback. In 1969 Dr. Fehmi co-founded the Biofeedback Society of America which later became the Association for Applied Physiology and Biofeedback. During the 1970s Dr. Fehmi used neurofeedback on hundreds of patients. He had them sit at a desk wearing a headband with a nest of electrodes attached to their scalp while they watched their EEG displayed in real time on a screen. They were asked to control their brain waves without being told how to do so, since nobody quite knows how this can be done. If they did not make the desired changes they were notified by bleeping noises and flashes of light.

Dr. Fehmi’s approach to neurofeedback was twofold. First he wanted patients to learn to synchronize their brain waves across their entire brains, because the brain operates most efficiently, effectively and under the least stress when brain cells in different brain regions are firing together (synchronously) in the same wave pattern. Second he wanted his patients to reduce beta (the highest frequency, most energetic brain waves in the range of 13-50 hertz) and increase the amount of their alpha waves (in the range of 8-12 hertz). At the higher end of beta frequency people show great mental effort, high mental energy expenditure, anxiety and tensed muscles. A college student taking an important exam who does not know the material and a driver who blares his horn and screams angrily after being cut off are in high beta. In the alpha frequency people are in a relaxed but alert state where they can observe and deal with the world without intense effort. Meditation puts people in an alpha state. You can also move from beta to alpha by closing your eyes.

During the 1970s Dr. Fehmi noticed an interesting phenomenon while treating his patients. All of them went through a difficult break-in period using neurofeedback where no matter how hard they tried they could not get the results they wanted. They couldn’t synchronize their brain waves or reduce beta and increase alpha frequencies. It was only when they gave up and were on the verge of quitting the training that they succeeded. It was only when they concluded that no amount of trying would succeed and they let go of trying, that they effortlessly brought their brain waves under conscious control. Dr. Fehmi concluded that to be successful in neurofeedback his patients had to give up their effortful orientation to the task.

This led Dr. Fehmi to realize that the how of attention (how we pay attention to something) is much more important than the what (the content of our attention). He began taking physiological measurements of people attending in effortful (beta) and relaxed (alpha) fashion. He found that effortful attention triggers the sympathetic nervous system with the adrenalized fight-flight response and over-reactivity;  whereas relaxed attention triggers the parasympathetic nervous system which keeps people calm and at ease. Dr. Fehmi also found that people learn information more quickly, more accurately and with much less effort in a relaxed mode of attention. People who approach tasks in an effortful way have greater difficulty and progress more slowly.

After years of studying attention Dr. Fehmi came up with different categories of attention. Narrow focus refers involves intense effortful attention associated with high beta waves. A person using narrow focus shrinks the aperture of his attention to one object (be it a person, thing or  idea) while pushing all other objects into the background and excluding them from consciousness insofar as possible. Open focus refers to a diffuse form of attention in which the person’s aperture of attention is wide open. In open focus a person remains aware of the object he’s attending to, but he is  simultaneously aware of his internal sensations, feelings and ideas, the objects in his environment along with their sounds, sights and smells; and the space in, around and between external objects.

Objective focus refers to a state of scientific detachment from the object of attention which is looked at as a wholly separate and distinct entity. It is accompanied by a high degree of self-consciousness, analysis and judgment. Immersed focus refers to a form of attention in which the observer experiences the object of attention from within, yield to it and joins with it. It is accompanied by sensations of union, pleasure and love and marked by a loss of self-consciousness and judgment.

According to Dr. Fehmi the most prevalent form of attentional style in our society is the narrow-objective kind. It can manifest as an obsessive-compulsive focus on a psychological or environmental object or as a denial of and shift of attention away from such an object. This kind of attention limits our awareness and stimulates fear and anxiety by separating us from our inner guidance system (our sensations, feelings, emotions, and intuitions) and from other people. Lawyers engage in the narrow-objective style of attention nearly all the time. They frequently focus on ideas, words and word meanings to the exclusion of their own physical sensations and feelings and their inner sense of what others are feelings. Dr. Fehmi says that people who are stuck in this mode of attention show awkwardness, lack of smoothness and fluidity in dealing with others and a tendency toward anxiety, worry, panic and rigidity.

Narrow-objective attention is a creature of the left brain. Our cave dwelling ancestors used it when they were out hunting or foraging and they had to scan their environment with utmost vigilance and urgency to spot predators like saber tooth tigers. Children in our day learn to use narrow-objective attention when they are told to stop day dreaming, focus on their homework and prove to their parents and teachers that they know their academic material. This amps up their nervous system. As children or as adult lawyers we can get stuck in this amped up state of great cognitive intensity which rigidifies one’s thinking and one’s muscles. Open states of attention act as a gear shifter that can take us out of this mental and physiological state in which we are stuck in over-drive. They allow us to get the best performance out of our brains and feel so much better.
Although narrow-objective attention has its uses, the problem (says Dr. Fehmi) is that we are addicted to it and we use it in many situations where it is more of a hindrance than a help. Narrow-objective focus is useful when learning the parts of the human body, but not when figuring out why a patient is dizzy or depressed. Narrow-objective focus is  useful in learning the notes to a music score but not when playing your part during a symphony orchestra performance. Narrow-objective focus may have some use during  sexual foreplay but not when making love. The key is in developing attentional flexibility so you can make use of all forms of attention at the appropriate time. Developing this flexibility helps release the psycho-physiological stress stored up through habitual use of narrow-objective attention.

When we stop excluding parts of our experience, open up our focus and allow our attention to equally and simultaneously spread out, we experience a softening of goal-directed behavior, a release of energy and a greater sense of wellbeing. The addiction to narrow-objective focus causes us to miss out on many opportunities to use open-diffused and open-immersed attention which are associated with the right brain and which give us a broader big-picture view which sparks creativity, empathy and spirituality. When the right brain is engaged sensory experiences become more fresh, vivid,  captivating, and satisfying. Our brains were designed to be multi-modal, which means they were designed to take in and integrate information from all five senses. We learn best and enjoy life most when we use our minds in a multi-modal fashion. Dr. Fehmi says that a life lived with open focus takes us away from tension, rigidity, anxiety and fatigue to ease, flexibility, efficiency, energy, productivity, spontaneity and creativity.

So how do we get there? You can either seek a solution to your problems in the content of your lived experience (memories of the past), which Dr. Fehmi says won’t work, or you can change your style of attention to open focus. When patients come to Dr. Fehmi for help he can give them neurofeedback, open focus exercises or both. The neurofeedback route is more expensive and requires multiple visits to his office in Princeton, New Jersey, to use the EEG machine.

Patients using neurofeedback benefit by producing more alpha than beta all over the brain and by harmonizing their production of alpha so the various parts of their brain emit alpha in unison like a choir. This allows information to pass through the brain more rapidly, fluidly and completely and allows for the greatest possible integration of information. It enables thinkers, artists, musicians and athletes to reach their peak performance. If you want to try this therapy your insurance might cover it, for instance if the presenting complaint was headache or insomnia. If you can’t make it to Princeton where Dr. Fehmi’s Princeton Biofeedback Center is located, you can go to his website at www.openfocus.com to find links to people he has trained in various parts of the country.

Open focus exercise therapy is inexpensive and can be done at home or at the office behind closed doors. You can do it with a CD. In 2007 Dr. Fehmi came out with The Open Focus Brain published by Trumpeter Books. It contains a companion CD with open focus exercises as well as written exercises after each chapter. I have tried the open focus exercises on CD and found them quite helpful. They put me in the same relaxed, tranquil and mildly euphoric state of mind that meditation does. Like meditation these exercises give me renewed mental clarity and extra energy. Open focus exercises and meditation both involve learning to accept rather than fight one’s sensations, feelings and ideas. In his book Dr. Fehmi talks about curing pain by turning into it, rather than running from it and trying to push it away. Whether you allow the imagined physical space around your pain or the space of your awareness to enter it and fuse with it, either way it will dissolve. The same holds true for negative thoughts and fears.

Based on his work with many thousands of patients Dr. Fehmi says that open focus work can become second nature after you do the exercises enough, and it can not only reduce your stress and anxiety, but help you with self-realization. Chronic stress breeds depression, substance abuse, insomnia, fatigue and stress-related disorders like asthma, allergies, rashes and psycho-somatic pain syndromes. When these have been cleared up, and your brain is working in alpha and firing synchronously, you can expect to experience renewed energy, productivity, enhanced relationships and improved performance in your work, sports, leisure and artistic activities.

Although open focus work is compatible with, and can be done simultaneously with, meditation, I know from experience that some people who could benefit from both modalities are not going to become long term meditators. Why? Some people don’t like sitting for prolonged periods of time in silence in the hope of reducing stress, improving mental clarity and gaining wisdom and compassion. They find listening to their own interior mental chatter intolerable – or they complain of distracting noises, physical pain or discomfort, boredom, restlessness, frustration, lack of progress and a host of other problems. Meditation isn’t for everyone. For these people open focus could be a safe, drug-free method of reducing stress, anxiety and depression while enhancing their performance of and enjoyment of their work and other activities.

NEW DISCOVERY IN RATS EXPLAINS HIGHER RATES OF ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION IN WOMEN BASED ON BRAIN DIFFERENCES

Thursday, June 24th, 2010
Epidemiologists know that women experience anxiety disorders three times as much as men and depression twice as much as men. In the past psychologists tried to account for this based on socialization. They noted that women are more open to talking about their feelings than men, and thus more likely to be diagnosed with a mood disorder than men. Before the women’s liberation movement, women were largely denied the right to work and were kept at home as housewives and mothers without the opportunity to engage their talents and leadership abilities. For many women this was an understandable source of frustration, grief, anger and depression. The expression “mother’s little helper” coined by the Rolling Stones in a song in 1966 referred to abuse of prescription drugs to get bored moms through their day.
After women changed our culture and got the right to work they took on the double burden of working and being the primary provider of childcare and housework. This occurred because many men were unwilling to take on more of the childcare and housework once their wives became employed. The double burden on women became a source of stress, fatigue and resentment towards their husbands. Psychologists have also noted that women are more subject to child abuse than men while growing up and this could explain their higher rates of PTSD.
While there may be some validity to these explanations, we now have a brain-based explanation of gender based differences in the rate of mood disorders thanks to research by behavioral neuroscientist Rita J. Valentino, Ph.D. and her research associate Debra A. Bangasser, Ph.D. In the June 15, 2010 issue of Molecular Psychiatry they reported the findings of their research on how the brains of male and female rats responded to stress. To tease out gender based differences they had rats undergo a swim stress test. After the test they found two differences related to CRF.
CRF or corticotropin releasing factor is a neuropeptide shared by rats and humans which is produced by the hypothalamus in response to stress. CRF signals the pituitary gland to secrete ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) into the bloodstream. ACTH binds to the adrenal glands and signals them to produce the stress hormones adrenalin and cortisol which kicks off the fight-flight response. These hormones increase heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure. They dilate the pupils, make your hairs stand on end and cause dry mouth. They make people feel jittery, nervous and over-excited in an unpleasant way. In healthy animals and people CRF is secreted episodically, briefly and only when the organism is stressed. Anxious individuals secrete CRF chronically and chronic secretion of CRF (with chronically high levels of cortisol in the blood) causes depression.
The researchers found two differences in the brains of female and male rats. In the female rats the brain receptors for CRF bound more tightly to the cell signaling protein than the receptors in the male rat brains. This  boosted cellular signaling of CRF in the female rat, making it more sensitive to lower levels of CRF. Furthermore, as CRF was released and the supply of CRF built up, the brains of male rats decreased the number of CRF receptors in the area of the brain called the locus ceruleus making male rats less sensitive to and less responsive to higher levels of CRF. This adaptive process which is called internalization did not occur in the female rat brains because a protein important for internalization (Beta-arrestin2) did not bind to CRF receptors. Compromised internalization makes female rats less able to resist the effects of higher levels of CRF. The researchers concluded that enhanced signaling makes female rats more sensitive to low levels of CRF and compromised internalization makes them less adaptable to higher levels of CRF.
Dr. Valentino said it is not yet known if these gender-based differences in the stress response of rats hold true for humans, but if they do, this would help account for the higher vulnerability of women to develop stress-based pathology. Since many similarities exist between the brains of rats and people, this could well be the case. Dr. Valentino also noted that past research on stress had used male rats and did not focus on gender based differences in how male and female rats responded to stress, which is why this discovery too so long to be made.
Even though women have much higher rates of anxiety and depression than men, men are four times more likely to commit suicide consequent to living with those problems. Why is that? Psychologists say it’s because women are more able to disclose their emotional pain, talk about their feelings, seek support from other women and get that support. This is not just a cultural phenomenon but aligns with the strong tend-and-befriend response in women produced by their much higher levels of the hormone oxytocin. The irony is that although women may be hormonally saddled with higher rates of mood disorders, they are better able than men to deal with those disorders and overcome them, in part because of the hormone oxytocin.
Thanks to this research paper more research will start coming out in the future to elucidate these differences, and this research could pave the way for new drugs to treat women’s mood disorders which takes cellular and molecular brain differences into account.

LEARN TO STOP RUMINATING ABOUT LAW OFFICE PROBLEMS

Thursday, June 17th, 2010
Rumination is a huge but completely unnecessary source of stress in a lawyer’s life. Rumination is an obsessive mental process which involves recurrent worrying and brooding over a past event or a concern about the future. Many lawyers engage in rumination. It may be triggered by a cruel remark from opposing counsel during a deposition (“Those objections are totally frivolous – did you really go to law school?”) or by a negative comment from the judge who rules against you on a motion (“How can you walk into my courtroom so unprepared for argument?”). It may be triggered by feelings of insecurity about your job during a period of law firm layoffs or by lack of money to meet sudden, unexpected expenses at home (e.g. a roof leak and sewer pipe leak during winter rains).
Rumination is the opposite of task-oriented, problem-solving, productive thinking. It is circular thinking which goes nowhere because it is stuck in a past event that cannot be changed or a future event that hasn’t occurred and may never occur. Rumination is thinking which is highly colored by negative emotion and self-blame. It poses questions which cannot be answered. For past events a ruminator will ask himself questions like “Why didn’t I say x?” or “Why didn’t I do x?” when the target event occurred. He replays the event over and over in his head like a painful mini-movie. Regarding future events (such as doing well in a job interview or trial or coming up with the money to pay bills), the ruminator will repeatedly question how on earth he will meet the challenge and these obsessive doubts will undermine his ability to do so.
Ruminative thinking wastes time by making mountains out of molehills, and by taking time away from the solution of real problems which can grow worse in the interim. How do you know when you’re ruminating rather than simply reflecting on an issue? Rumination goes on for a long time – hours and days rather than minutes. Rumination is disruptive. It breaks into the performance of tasks whether it’s writing a letter, editing a brief, driving or grocery shopping. It can keep you up at night and prevent you from resting or napping. It precludes periods of refreshing mental silence. It puts you into chronic fight-flight mode where you’re pumped full of stress hormones. Ruminative thinking saps you of energy and hope. It causes anxiety, fatigue and depression.
How can a lawyer stop ruminating? In my book The Upward Spiral: Getting Lawyers From Daily Misery To Lifetime Wellbeing I offered a number of solutions. These include using deep breathing, the Relaxation Response, the Body Scan, meditation, learned optimism (the adoption of a positive explanatory style), smiling, laughing, walking in nature and exercising. All of these activities help break the rumination circuit. All of them reduce levels of the stress hormone cortisol and increase feel good endorphins. All of them help you unclench physically and mentally.
Here I want to talk about acceptance, meditation and learned optimism. Acceptance does not mean resigning yourself to failure, dissatisfaction or unhappiness. Rather acceptance means taking time to look at the challenges which are stressing you, figure out which situations cannot be changed and which can, and then taking practical steps to change the ones that are fixable. If you lost a trial and the appeal was denied, you can’t change what happened. However, you can have some compassion for yourself and forgive yourself. You can take also take responsibility for what happened, learn some valuable lessons from the loss and move on with your career. This is acceptance.
Meditation is a means of mental training in the art of “letting go” and moving into present moment awareness stripped of judgments (“I’m a failure”) and narratives (“I’m a failure, because……….”). While rumination is a form of extreme attachment to negative thoughts or worries which continuously pummel and victimize you, meditation is a technique for detachment and freedom. In meditation you learn to relax your breathing and belly, to relax your mind and allow thoughts to arise, pass through consciousness and disappear. At the heart of meditation is the wisdom that the labels, judgments and stories we accept as real and true are purely mind-generated and represent the responses of our mind to experience rather than a direct experience of reality. Once we realize our stories aren’t reality they no longer wield power over our moods and emotional wellbeing.
If you believe you have a self which exists in the world as a kind of object, that another lawyer harmed your self by making an offensive comment to you, that you are inadequate because you failed to protect your self when the comment was made, and that you must heal your self through a future act of retribution, then you will be chronically troubled by an offhand insult. The chain of rumination forged by these beliefs will prevent you from feeling the warmth of the sun, savoring the smell of the spring flowers in your yard or reveling in the moment your toddler reaches out to hold your hand. Buddhism teaches that the self is just another mind-generated concept, so there is no need to protect it, fret over it or fight over it. The more you meditate the more time you will spend in the present, where the perceived problems of the past and future do not exist, where the story of the self does not exist, and where you can tap into the deep wellspring of positive energy lying beneath the ruminating mind.
Learned optimism means changing how you explain setbacks to yourself in a way which avoids chronic discouragement and helplessness while promoting hope and constructive activity to solve problems. According to Martin Seligman, Ph.D., pessimists see bad events as permanent, pervasive and personal. In their mind their losing streak will never end, their bad luck extends to everything they venture to accomplish in life and they have been selected for a life of misfortune. Optimists see bad events as temporary, limited and impersonal. In their mind a setback is an obstacle which can be overcome with effort. It’s something that affects just one part of their life not its entirety. It’s something that was caused by circumstances which could have happened to anyone, and they are not personally at fault for those circumstances. When you practice thinking this way you learn to be optimistic.
Optimism frees up you to solve the problems that cause you emotional pain and set off rumination. While rumination raises blood cortisol and produces bad health conditions like hypertension, coronary heart disease and depression, optimism is highly beneficial to your health. Hilary Tindle and colleagues published a study in the August 2009 issue of the American Heart Association journal called Circulation stating that optimists are less likely to develop coronary heart disease and less likely to die of any causes than pessimists. The researchers monitored the health of 97,253 post-menopausal women who had no history of heart disease or cancer over an eight year period. They found that for every 10,000 optimists 43 developed coronary heart disease and 46 died, while for every 10,000 pessimists 60 developed coronary heart disease and 63 died.
If you have a problem with rumination it’s best to acknowledge it and seek help. By using acceptance, meditation and learned optimism you can end rumination and free yourself to live in the present moment without the distraction and anguish that comes from obsessive negative thoughts. If these techniques do not work for you it’s possible the rumination is coming from a mental illness such as major depression (associated with low serotonin) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (associated with low serotonin and excessive dopamine). If this is the case, then seeing a psychiatrist for appropriate medication (typically an SSRI) and getting trained by a psychologist in cognitive-behavior therapy can make a real difference. Obsessive-compulsive disorder isn’t rare. It’s the fourth most common mental illness and is diagnosed as often as asthma and diabetes. Rumination is emotionally painful and economically harmful. Don’t tolerate it for another day. Take action to free yourself and gain relief.

REGULAR EXERCISE REDUCES ANXIETY SYMPTOMS BY 20 PERCENT

Friday, May 28th, 2010
Not everyone afflicted with anxiety has insurance coverage for medication or cognitive behavioral therapy. There are also people with coverage who prefer not to use these treatment methods or who find them unhelpful. For these people, regular exercise
can be quite effective at reducing anxiety symptoms.
The February 22, 2010 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine has a study demonstrating that regular exercise reduces anxiety symptoms by an average of 20% in people suffering a broad spectrum of ailments including heart disease, chronic pain, cancer and multiple sclerosis. The study was done at the University of Georgia by Matthew Herring, M.S. (a doctoral student in kinesiology), Professor of Kinesiology Rodney Dishman, Ph.D., and Professor of Exercise Psychology Patrick O’Connor, Ph.D.. The researchers analyzed the results of 40 randomized clinical trials involving nearly 3,000 patients done between 1995 and 2007. In 90% of the clinical trials the exercise group had fewer symptoms of worry, apprehension, and nervousness, than the non-exercising control group. The researchers concluded that exercise is useful in treating a variety of physical and mental health conditions with less risk of adverse events than medication.
Jaspar Smits, director of the Anxiety Research and Treatment Program at Southern Methodist University in Dallas and Michael Otto, psychology professor at Boston University, also collaborated on a meta-analysis of studies on the effects of regular exercise on mental health. They presented their findings to the Anxiety Disorder Association of America in Baltimore, MD, on March 6, 2010. According to Dr. Smits,  “Exercise appears to affect, like an anti-depressant, particular neurotransmitter systems in the brain, and it helps patients with depression re-establish positive behaviors. For patients with anxiety disorders, exercise reduces their fears of fear and related bodily sensations such as racing heart and rapid breathing.”
At some point in their lives 46% of Americans will have a mental illness. The mood disorders of depression and anxiety are by far the most common. Could this have something to do with 40% of Americans being sedentary while living in a society filled with stressors? Smits recommends that people engage in 150 minutes a week of moderate intensity exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity exercise per week. He urges doctors to prescribe exercise for their patients which will improve their mood, reduce their stress and increase their energy. Smits and Otto have a website at www.smuresearch.com and they have written a workbook called Exercise for Mood and Anxiety Disorders to be used by therapists and their patients.
The evidence is clear that regular exercise can improve anxiety symptoms. But remember it is not mutually exclusive with respect to psychotherapy or anti-anxiety medication. It can complement them. If you are already taking medication for anxiety, and you have no medical contra-indications for regular exercise, why not start exercising to gain added symptom relief? While depression can stop people from exercising due to apathy, lethargy and hopelessness, anxiety can prevent people from exercising because it paralyzes them with unrelenting doubts and fears. If you are in this situation you can obtain help by finding a psychologist or therapist who uses the approach advocated by Dr. Smits and Dr. Otto which incorporates sensitivity to subjective blocks to exercise.
Not everyone afflicted with anxiety has insurance coverage for medication or cognitive behavioral therapy. There are also people with coverage who prefer not to use these treatment methods or who find them unhelpful. For these people, regular exercise can be quite effective at reducing anxiety symptoms.
The February 22, 2010 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine has a study demonstrating that regular exercise reduces anxiety symptoms by an average of 20% in people suffering a broad spectrum of ailments including heart disease, chronic pain, cancer and multiple sclerosis. The study was done at the University of Georgia by Matthew Herring, M.S. (a doctoral student in kinesiology), Professor of Kinesiology Rodney Dishman, Ph.D., and Professor of Exercise Psychology Patrick O’Connor, Ph.D.. The researchers analyzed the results of 40 randomized clinical trials involving nearly 3,000 patients done between 1995 and 2007. In 90% of the clinical trials the exercise group had fewer symptoms of worry, apprehension, and nervousness, than the non-exercising control group. The researchers concluded that exercise is useful in treating a variety of physical and mental health conditions with less risk of adverse events than medication.
Jaspar Smits, director of the Anxiety Research and Treatment Program at Southern Methodist University in Dallas and Michael Otto, psychology professor at Boston University, also collaborated on a meta-analysis of studies on the effects of regular exercise on mental health. They presented their findings to the Anxiety Disorder Association of America in Baltimore, MD, on March 6, 2010. According to Dr. Smits,  “Exercise appears to affect, like an anti-depressant, particular neurotransmitter systems in the brain, and it helps patients with depression re-establish positive behaviors. For patients with anxiety disorders, exercise reduces their fears of fear and related bodily sensations such as racing heart and rapid breathing.”
At some point in their lives 46% of Americans will have a mental illness. The mood disorders of depression and anxiety are by far the most common. Could this have something to do with 40% of Americans being sedentary while living in a society filled with stressors? Smits recommends that people engage in 150 minutes a week of moderate intensity exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity exercise per week. He urges doctors to prescribe exercise for their patients which will improve their mood, reduce their stress and increase their energy. Smits and Otto have a website at www.smuresearch.com and they have written a workbook called Exercise for Mood and Anxiety Disorders to be used by therapists and their patients.
The evidence is clear that regular exercise can improve anxiety symptoms. But remember it is not mutually exclusive with respect to psychotherapy or anti-anxiety medication. It can complement them. If you are already taking medication for anxiety, and you have no medical contra-indications for regular exercise, why not start exercising to gain added symptom relief? While depression can stop people from exercising due to apathy, lethargy and hopelessness, anxiety can prevent people from exercising because it paralyzes them with unrelenting doubts and fears. If you are in this situation you can obtain help by finding a psychologist or therapist who uses the approach advocated by Dr. Smits and Dr. Otto which incorporates sensitivity to subjective blocks to exercise.

Click here to purchase The Upward Spiral: Getting Lawyers From Daily Misery To Lifetime Wellbeing by Harvey Hyman

Click here to purchase  audio downloads of  MCLE lectures by Harvey Hyman